Holy Mother of WTF?

[CrAnIuM]

Preggers at age 66 ........


Oh hells fucking no.


A wealthy, 66-year-old divorcée has defied her age -- and Mother Nature -- by becoming the oldest woman in Britain
ever to get pregnant, setting off a storm of controversy in the medical world.


Elizabeth Adeney expects to give birth in June through a C-section, according to reports, after
conceiving in vitro at a fertility clinic in the Ukraine -- because British clinics do not treat women over 50.


The baby is believed to be the first for Adeney, who used
donor eggs and sperm, but the pregnancy has kicked off a raging debate over the ethics of helping a woman of her age to conceive.
Professor Severino Antinori, Britain's top medical expert on helping older women bear children, weighed in against the pregnancy -- explaining last week that Adeney's advanced age made it unfair to the child. Adeney would be 80 when her child becomes a teenager.


"I'm shocked by the idea of a 66-year-old woman giving birth," Antinori told The Sunday Times of London. "I respect the choice medically, but I think anything over 63 is risky, because you cannot guarantee the child will have a loving mother or family."


He said he feared the child would end up suffering from the lack of a parent.
"It is possible to give a child to the mother up to the age of 83, but it is medically criminal to do this," he said, "because the likelihood is that, after a year or two, the child will lose his mum and suffer from psychological problems."


Despite her age, however, the gray-haired Adeney has not slowed down in her third trimester. She still works five days a week, managing a firm that manufactures plastic and textile products, reports say.
But she declined to discuss the pregnancy with the media last week, other than telling The Daily Mail that her reasons for conceiving were personal.


"I am a private person, and while I appreciate there may be some publicity, I will just ignore it," she said. "This has been a very personal decision, and I do not feel I have to give interviews or talk to anyone in the media about what I have decided to do and where I have done it."
She has spared no expense in preparing for the baby, having already built a nursery in her $800,000 home in Lidgate, an idyllic village in central England, and hired a live-in nanny.


A 70-year-old from India is the oldest known woman to give birth. She bore twins in 2008.
jfanelli@nypost.com




YouTube - Woman is Pregnant at 66

[CrAnIuM]

The Libertarian in me says, Yeah good for you and your statement of "fuck the world it's my decision ...

By the realist in me says OMFG !!!

What goes through a woman's mind .. what the fuck ?

When have you EVER heard of a dude getting all fucking mental about having kids ?

When ? Fucking never, because MEN are NOT stunted by the retard vagina poison and the boom boom boom of a ticking momma clock.



Fucking crazy man ..

[Blood]

Yeah that is pretty selfish.

My mom had me when she was 42...and to me that was really pushing it because i had to grow up with my mother being more of a grandmother than a real mother. =/

But just like the octo mom, it seems to be a frightening trend in women these days to selfishly have kids that they can't possibly take care of just for the sake of the 'experience'.

[SlimSkeeter]

The first thing I thought of when I read this article this morning was "octo-mom". I can't help but see this as being another chapter like that. I was an oops, my parents had me late in life, and like Blood, my mother was more of a grandmother. I was mistaken for her grandson several times.

[Negativecool]

On the bright side, she'll be dead soon.

[CrAnIuM]

Ehh ..

She's educated, she's financially set.

Still, the age thing just kicks me in the nads every time I think of it.

[SittinGrumpy]

This isn't something I agree with but more power to her.

[Negativecool]

I hope she dies during birth while enduring the most excruciating chode tearing pain.


That'll teach 'er.



Yea...then she'll learn.

[Mamba]

I don't agree with this, mainly because the child will only have 1/3 of their life with a mother (if they're lucky.) Not good.

I mean, it's amazing from a scientific point of view - but I am morally against it.

[Scabman]

Antinori told The Sunday Times of London. "I respect the choice medically, but I think anything over 63 is risky, because you cannot guarantee the child will have a loving mother or family."

One can never guarantee any child neither a loving mother or a family.

[Mamba]

One can never guarantee any child neither a loving mother or a family.

Too true.